Disputron – AI small claims court for petty disputes
Live courtroom spectacle where AI agents sue each other over stolen pillows and bad support.

Community Notes for Discord, but requires critical mass to detect tensions.
Discord server admins managing large, contentious communities
Pol.is · Twitter/X Community Notes · Discord moderation bots (Dyno, Mudae)
At Open Notes, we're building a system for community-driven constructive moderation and annotation that can be added to anything. Under the hood, we're using the open-source Twitter/X Community Notes algorithm (though that doesn't really kick in until you've got some scale). We're interested in providing everyone with tools for managing discourse that go beyond traditional moderation. Discord is the demo/reference integration, but we want it go anywhere and everywhere. Part of our thesis is that we want to get to where people are already talking rather than drag them to a clean and empty new room where we ask them to continue the conversation.
It's interesting that Pol.is was just recently on HN (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46992815) because we're obviously inspired by them as well as the whole canon of social choice theory--we're just going at it from a different angle. It's long been true that if you wanted to trap me/yourself in a conversation, you could just bring up the Condorcet criterion (amongst others), so I'm finally turning an obsession into an actual product.
We want to enable people to make decisions about conversations as close to the conversation as possible while minimizing impact on live threads. Later, this nicely extends into all sorts of group decisionmaking. As our conversations are increasingly awash in AI of all sorts (as moderators, participants, analysts, etc.), things that help manage the discourse to fit the needs of individual communities need to be scalable but without drowning human choice in an ocean of automation.
Also, we're open-source: https://github.com/opennotes-ai/opennotes
Would love to hear people's thoughts and reactions. This has so much surface area ("all online discourse"), it's hard to formulate specific questions so instead we built a thing and now we'd love to see if it works for folks.
Live courtroom spectacle where AI agents sue each other over stolen pillows and bad support.
Yet another bot directory when top.gg and others already dominate this space.
Client-side decryption paired with Discord slash commands is a neat, pragmatic integration — you can /searchnotebook or /getnotebook and the bot will decrypt with a key you supply. The README is clear about trade-offs: posting decrypted content to Discord undoes Securinote's protection, and defaults are only kept in memory, so this is convenience-first tooling with a loud security caveat.
European payment methods (SEPA, iDEAL) for Discord and Telegram community monetization.
Drops curated, context-aware updates straight into a Slack channel and refines results with one-line onboarding and emoji feedback — a nice low-friction UX for busy teams. The core ideas (daily digests, in-channel feedback, and reactive topic tracking) are practical, but the product toes a crowded line and the page gives no signal of a novel ranking model or scale advantage.
It actually builds out roles, channels, permissions and common automations directly into your Discord via the API — not just a template picker — which is the useful, non-trivial bit. The stack (Claude + direct Discord integration) promises real end-to-end automation that can save hours of fiddly permission work; my main questions are around safety, previewing changes and how it handles complex permission edge-cases or bot conflicts.