Orcastrate – Sync GitHub Actions workflows across repos via templates
Syncs workflow files across repos via templates, catching drift GitHub reusable workflows miss.

The product's real selling point is the iterative verification loop: AI inspects PRs/branches, surfaces exploitable issues with file+line and severity, and then re-runs reviews to confirm fixes — that workflow (Open → In Progress → Resolved → Closed/Rejected) is practical and would reduce issues slipping through. Promising as a unified place for docs, review, security and perf, but success depends heavily on low false-positive rates and transparent evidence for security findings; without that, it risks feeling like another noisy scanner.
Engineering teams, backend/frontend developers, security engineers, performance engineers, and engineering managers
Over the past few months, we’ve been building Everdone — an AI-powered engineering workflow platform.
We initially launched with: - CodeDoc (AI-generated code documentation) - CodeReview (structured issue detection + tracking)
Today we’ve added two more services: - CodeSecurity — iterative application security review - CodePerformance — structured performance improvement workflow
Why we built CodeSecurity Most security tools generate a report and stop there.
In practice, teams: - Fix a few issues - Forget the rest - Don’t re-verify properly
We designed CodeSecurity as an iterative loop instead of a one-off scan: - Connect GitHub - Select a PR or branch - AI reviews for real, exploitable vulnerabilities - Engineers fix - Re-run → AI verifies whether issues are actually resolved
Issues are tracked with: - Severity (High/Medium/Low) - File + line numbers - Concrete suggested fixes - Status workflow (Open → In Progress → Resolved → Closed/Rejected) - Full verification history
It behaves more like a managed security workflow than a static analyzer.
Why we built CodePerformance Performance reviews often happen reactively (after something slows down in prod).
CodePerformance focuses on material runtime impact: - Algorithmic inefficiencies - N+1 queries - Blocking I/O - Memory pressure - Concurrency bottlenecks - Event-loop blocking (Node), GIL issues (Python), etc.
Same loop: Find → Fix → Re-run → Verified.
Current platform Everdone now includes: - CodeDoc - CodeReview - CodeSecurity - CodePerformance
Pricing: - First 200 files free - $0.05 per file per review (early access pricing) - Unlimited users - No contracts
Usage-based only.
We also have live demos on public OSS repos if anyone wants to explore without signing up.
We’re trying to build “Work as a Service” — AI systems that fit into real engineering workflows rather than replacing them or generating static reports.
Would love feedback from other founders or engineering teams.
Happy to answer anything.
— Vinit
Syncs workflow files across repos via templates, catching drift GitHub reusable workflows miss.
Vanity metric generator for engineering leaders who love dashboards.
Smart PR sections auto-group by merge readiness when GitHub's UI gets overwhelming.
Privacy-first PR dashboard that runs entirely in your browser, no accounts.
Claude as autonomous CI agent reviewing PRs and auto-fixing failures—clever use of GitHub Actions but read-it-later is crowded.
Route scoping from changed files cuts noise versus Percy's blanket screenshot approach.