Back to browse
A One-Page Field Guide to Questioning

A One-Page Field Guide to Questioning

by kbrkbr·Mar 2, 2026·1 point·0 comments

AI Analysis

MidBig Brain

Lightweight questioning framework, but MECE checklists and interview guides already exist.

Strengths
  • Distills questioning into memorable three-phase model (overview → details → loose ends) applicable across domains—genuine compression of tacit knowledge.
  • Intentionally minimal: single page, no jargon, actionable for someone improvising under pressure.
Weaknesses
  • Lacks novel insight beyond established frameworks (Erotetics, journalism inquiry methods); no worked examples or usable templates to differentiate from existing guides.
  • Static educational content without interactive tools, trainable models, or domain-specific checklists limits practical utility.
Category
Target Audience

Incident commanders, debuggers, journalists, anyone conducting structured investigations

Similar To

The Curious Journalist's Handbook · Klein's Recognition-Primed Decision Model · Erotetic Logic literature

Post Description

This field guide grew out of a longer essay I wrote on questioning and stories. I was trying to understand how questioning actually works in practice, and whether there is a minimal structure behind it.

Most material I found focuses on techniques or interview tactics, or is very abstract like the Erotetics literature. I was more interested in understanding the parts and how they work together.

Questioning seems to be an underrated skill in incident investigations, debugging, and project clarification.

I tried to compress what I found into a single visual model.

The diagram reduces inquiry to a few simple moves:

- Track nouns, verbs, qualifiers, time and place

- Move in phases: overview => details => loose ends

- Use question types and tools appropriate to the goal of each phase

It is intentionally small and easy to remember. It will not make anyone a brilliant interrogator, but it provides a minimal structure when you would otherwise improvise. It might be helpful to practitioners.

I would be interested in critical feedback, especially from people who use structured questioning in technical or investigative work.

Similar Projects