Back to browse
GitHub Repository
5 starsJavaScript

Open-source YouTube summary, transcript chat, and timeline sidepanel

by oujiangping·Mar 18, 2026·2 points·0 comments

AI Analysis

●●SolidBig BrainShip It

Transcript-first chat beats one-shot summaries from Eightify and SummarizeTech.

Strengths
  • Transcript as source of truth enables genuine follow-up questions instead of static summaries
  • Bring-your-own API keys eliminates recurring subscription fees for heavy users
  • Side panel integration keeps workspace adjacent to video without context switching
Weaknesses
  • Manual caption activation requirement adds friction before the tool becomes usable
  • No Chrome Web Store distribution means manual developer mode installation required
Category
Target Audience

YouTube power users, researchers, and students watching long-form educational content

Similar To

Eightify · SummarizeTech · YouTube Summary with Chat

Post Description

Hi HN — I built QuickSummarize, an open-source Chrome extension for working with YouTube videos through captions. The core idea is to make video Q&A transcript-first instead of treating a one-time summary as the whole memory. Current workflow: - summary - transcript-first chat - timeline browsing - subtitle export It runs in the Chrome side panel and currently focuses on YouTube. A few implementation choices I cared about: - transcript is the main source of truth for follow-up questions - bring-your-own API instead of another hosted subscription - support for both OpenAI-compatible APIs and Anthropic-style APIs - English / Chinese UI Still early, but it already feels more useful to me than the usual one-shot “summarize this video” flow. Would especially love feedback on: - whether transcript-first chat is actually the right UX - how people think about long-video memory/retrieval - caption reliability edge cases

Similar Projects

SaaS●●Solid

Transcriptum – fast video transcription with speaker labels and summary

It pairs WhisperX-grade transcription (speaker diarization and word-level timestamps) with optional multi-LLM analysis — summaries, Q&A, sentiment, topics and even fact-checking — plus YouTube import and standard export formats. Being vendor-agnostic and offering fact-checking is a smart differentiator, but the space is crowded (Descript/Otter/etc.); clearer accuracy numbers, pricing, or unique workflow hooks would make this stand out.

Solve My ProblemSlick
lpeancovschi
103mo ago