Back to browse
Large scale hallucinated citation problem in published literature

Large scale hallucinated citation problem in published literature

by cyclecycle·Apr 3, 2026·2 points·0 comments

AI Analysis

Pass

Important research but this is a news article, not a Show HN software project.

Strengths
  • Collaboration with Nature lends credibility to the citation analysis methodology
  • 20k paper sample from ChatGPT API provides concrete error classification data
Weaknesses
  • This is journalism linking to Nature, not a tool or product to evaluate
  • Grounded AI company promotion disguised as research sharing
Category
Target Audience

Researchers and academics concerned about AI citation integrity

Post Description

Hey, Nick Morley from Grounded AI here (https://groundedai.company/)

We collaborated with Nature to study the extent of fake/frankenstein citations in scholarly literature (from top 5 publishers - Springer, Elsevier, Wiley, Sage, Taylor & Francis)

We're estimating hundreds of thousands of papers affected in 2025 with hallucinated citation issues

As part of the work we analysed 20k papers generated with ChatGPT API to figure out which citation errors are characteristic of gen AI use and use that classify the errors we saw

The world's gone mad, publishing is in a nuts state, the training data is poisoned!

Similar Projects

AI/ML●●●Banger

Tako AI – Agent for Okta With Natural language (zero hallucination)

ReAct + code-exec agent for Okta sidesteps hallucination entirely; solves a real admin pain point.

Solve My ProblemBig BrainZero to One
danFctr
104mo ago