I built a $9 Ahrefs alternative because raw SEO data is cheap
Yet another SEO tool competing with Ahrefs and Semrush on price alone.

Cheaper Ahrefs clone that lacks the backlink database depth enterprise users need.
Indie hackers and small business owners doing their own SEO
Ahrefs · Semrush · Ubersuggest
Yet another SEO tool competing with Ahrefs and Semrush on price alone.
The YNAB import wizard is the product's strongest play — migrating your full history removes the biggest friction for switching. Keyboard-first shortcuts, shared budgets for up to five people, and a $40/yr base plan make it a practical, cost-focused alternative rather than a reinvention. It doesn't break new ground conceptually, but the feature set and migration tooling are exactly the pragmatic wins price-sensitive YNAB users care about.
It turns live SERPs into actionable outlines — headings, per-section word counts, intent classification and content-gap bullets that writers can use immediately. The UI makes the core workflow obvious and fast, but it reads as a tactical add-on to established SEO suites: no backlink or authority signals, unclear export/API options, and potential scraping/captcha limits could blunt its value at scale.
It actually compares your article to live SERP winners across content quality, on-page SEO, competitiveness and AI-search readiness — then spits out missing subtopics, long-tail keyword ideas, and title/meta suggestions you can copy. The UI is clean and focused (URL + optional keyword + Cloudflare verification), but the idea is familiar to anyone using Surfer/MarketMuse; the real question is how thorough the extraction and scoring logic are, and whether the free limits and methodology hold up for serious audits.
Claude integration for keyword research, but Semrush, Ahrefs already dominate.
x402 pay-per-invocation billing is a genuinely novel approach to agent economics.