HN Showcase
Back to browse
I'm 17 and built a tool that scores all stocks against Buffett criteria

I'm 17 and built a tool that scores all stocks against Buffett criteria

by zaidg7·May 24, 2026·2 points·2 comments
Visit ProjectView on HN

AI Analysis

●MidSlickCrowd Pleaser

Buffett-style stock scoring when Morningstar and Simply Wall St already do this.

Strengths
  • •Deterministic checks based on published investor frameworks, not vague AI vibes.
  • •Boardroom feature simulates debates between four investing legends with sourced quotes.
  • •Live track record and backtest vs S&P 500 shown transparently on landing page.
Weaknesses
  • •No clear differentiation from established tools like Morningstar or Simply Wall St.
  • •Backtested performance claims lack third-party verification or methodology details.
Category
Finance
Target Audience

Retail investors and value investing enthusiasts

Similar To

Morningstar · Simply Wall St · Finviz

Post Description

not just Buffett, it scores 12,500 stocks against Buffett, Graham and Lynch frameworks

Similar Projects

Finance●●Solid

I screened the entire S&P using Warren Buffett's criteria

It automates a very specific, beloved cookbook — 12 Buffett-style filters plus a 10-year financial scrape and DCF — then layers an AI-written moat and management evaluation on top. The combination of deterministic screening (ROE/ROIC/debt/FCF consistency) with an automated qualitative thesis is the product's smart move; what I'd like to see next is more transparency on the AI model and DCF assumptions so you can trust the outputs instead of just reading them.

Niche GemSlickSolve My Problem
lldougl
114mo ago
Finance●●Solid

Stock skill for OpenClaw 6,500 stocks, 900 days of data

You get momentum scores, RSI, EMA alignment, coil-breakout detection and concise bull/bear briefs out of the box — plus an OpenClaw skill so an LLM agent can answer “how's $NVDA looking?” immediately. The author ships 900+ days of backtested signals and open, dependency-free Python scripts which is refreshingly transparent, but the headline win-rate/return claims need independent audit (survivorship and lookahead bias are the obvious caveats) and the product looks focused on US/end-of-day use-cases.

Niche GemSolve My Problem
AaronBMoore
104mo ago