SaaS●●●Banger
AI assistants confidently get SaaS product facts wrong
Scans ChatGPT and Claude to catch lies about your SaaS pricing.
Zero to OneBig BrainSolve My Problem
gissurthor
102mo ago
Back to browse
An API that catches what your LLM confidently got wrong
by hanwoo·Apr 9, 2026·5 points·2 comments
AI Analysis
●●SolidSlickSolve My Problem
Six specialized endpoints including causality graphs for grounding AI outputs.
Strengths
- •<200ms latency makes real-time fact-checking feasible during AI generation pipelines.
- •Causality graph endpoint is unique — most verification APIs only do claim matching.
- •Credit-based pricing with 100 free credits lets developers test before committing.
Weaknesses
- •Fact-checking API space is growing crowded with Google Fact Check and others.
- •No transparency on source databases or how causal reasoning is actually computed.
Category
Target Audience
AI application developers, RAG system builders
Similar Projects
AI/ML●●Solid
Audit any AI/data pairing with Veritrooper
Cross-vendor verification catches hallucinations when LangSmith and Arize exist.
Big BrainSolve My Problem
brian8620
2115d ago
AI/ML●●Solid
Fact check, summarize, explain any article or webpage on local CPU
Fact-checks claims against live web sources using a tiny 0.8B model on CPU.
Solve My ProblemDark Horse
mrkn1
5014d ago
AI/ML●●Solid
DocForge – Multi-Agent RAG That Fact-Checks Its Own Answers
Multi-agent fact-checking loop, but RAG hallucination fixes are table stakes now.
Big BrainShip It
toheed11
114mo ago
AI/ML●●●Banger
Director-AI – token-level NLI+RAG
Token-level streaming halt stops hallucinations mid-sentence before user sees them—genuinely novel safety layer.
Big BrainWizardry
anulum
273mo ago
AI/ML●●Solid
Collective-AI.org Multiple line-of-sights for high-stakes questions
Kahneman's adversarial collaboration applied to multi-model debates, not just model ensemble.
Big BrainSolve My Problem
billylo
103mo ago